linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Annotate dev_err_probe() with __must

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:55:07 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Annotate dev_err_probe() with
 __must_check

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:44:30AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:44 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > -int dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...);
> > +int __must_check dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...);
> 
> Generally, the __must_check should go before the return type
> and the extern isn't necessary and is also generally not used
> in device.h, so I'd prefer:
> 
> __printf(3, 4)
> __must_check int dev_err_probe(...);

I grepped the current code... I don't see support of your preference.
Maybe I missed something? (I'm talking about include/*)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko