[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72fab2376722c6169549669016933217d3da34a0.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:19:35 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Guilhem Lettron <guilhem@...pilot.io>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Add ICL support
Indeed, when I compare them:
acpi_idle (without the patch):
CPU%c1 CPU%c6 CPU%c7 CoreTmp PkgTmp GFX%rc6 Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10 PkgWatt
29.48 0.00 60.71 58 58 97.96 16.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.08
intel_idle (with the patch):
CPU%c1 CPU%c6 CPU%c7 CoreTmp PkgTmp GFX%rc6 Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10 PkgWatt
56 56 96.64 300 68.29 48.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00
With intel_idle we reach PC10, without it we only go as deep as PC2 - huge difference.
I really wonder why the BIOS does not expose deeper C-states... And if
it does not, is this for a reason? And how windows works then?
May be there is a BIOS update that fixes this problem? May be Windows
user get it quickly because stuff like this is often well-integrated in
Windows? Would you please check if there is newer BIOS?
Artem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists