[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826164604.GW6642@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:46:05 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for
shadow stack
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 04:34:27PM -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> On 8/25/2020 4:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >On 8/25/20 2:04 PM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> >>>>I think this is more arch-specific. Even if it becomes a new syscall,
> >>>>we still need to pass the same parameters.
> >>>
> >>>Right, but without the copying in and out of memory.
> >>>
> >>Linux-api is already on the Cc list. Do we need to add more people to
> >>get some agreements for the syscall?
> >What kind of agreement are you looking for? I'd suggest just coding it
> >up and posting the patches. Adding syscalls really is really pretty
> >straightforward and isn't much code at all.
> >
>
> Sure, I will do that.
Alternatively, would a regular prctl() work here?
arch_prctl() feels like a historical weirdness for x86 -- other arches
all seem to be using regular prctl(), which allows for 4 args. I don't
know the history behind the difference here.
(Since prctl() and arch_prctl() use non-clashing command numbers, I had
wondered whether it would be worth just merging the x86 calls in with
the rest and making the two calls aliases. That's one for later,
though...)
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists