lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a3ce1d4-ddd5-f000-9cf0-5d06e2cc2047@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:59:47 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: broadcom: Fix SP804 node

On 8/26/20 11:53 AM, André Przywara wrote:
> On 26/08/2020 19:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 8/26/20 11:38 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The DT binding for SP804 requires to have an "arm,primecell" compatible
>>> string.
>>> Add this string so that the Linux primecell bus driver picks the device
>>> up and activates the clock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
>>
>> The commit subject should be:
>>
>> ARM: dts: NSP: Fix SP804 compatible node
>>
>> and we should probably have a Fixes tag that is:
>>
>> Fixes: a0efb0d28b77 ("ARM: dts: NSP: Add SP804 Support to DT")
>>
>> Could you please re-submit with those things corrected? Thanks
> 
> Sure, will include that in a v2.
> 
> Out of curiosity, do you have the hardware and can check the impact that
> has?

I have the hardware and could run some tests if you would like.

> Not sure we actually create the device without the primecell compatible?
> Or is the sp804 an exception here, compared to the other AMBA devices
> (SP805, PL011)?

No idea, I have never used those timers personally, and I doubt that
anybody besides me within broadcom and hobbyists actually care about NSP
these days.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ