lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7916109-6590-756b-dafc-7976e42fc44d@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:28:48 -0500
From:   Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: SVM: Modify intercept_exceptions to generic
 intercepts



On 8/26/20 3:55 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:14 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Modify intercept_exceptions to generic intercepts in vmcb_control_area. Use
>> the generic vmcb_set_intercept, vmcb_clr_intercept and vmcb_is_intercept to
>> set/clear/test the intercept_exceptions bits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
>> ---
> 
>> @@ -835,7 +832,7 @@ static bool nested_exit_on_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>  {
>>         unsigned int nr = svm->vcpu.arch.exception.nr;
>>
>> -       return (svm->nested.ctl.intercept_exceptions & (1 << nr));
>> +       return (svm->nested.ctl.intercepts[EXCEPTION_VECTOR] & (1 << nr));
> Nit: BIT(nr) rather than (1 << nr).

Sure. will change it. thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ