[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu2iw86q.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 02:40:45 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@...el.com>,
Srikanth Nandamuri <srikanth.nandamuri@...el.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/hotplug: Silence APIC only after all irq's are migrated
Ashok,
On Thu, Aug 20 2020 at 17:42, Ashok Raj wrote:
> When offlining CPUs, fixup_irqs() migrates all interrupts away from the
> outgoing CPU to an online CPU. It's always possible the device sent an
> interrupt to the previous CPU destination. Pending interrupt bit in IRR in
> LAPIC identifies such interrupts. apic_soft_disable() will not capture any
> new interrupts in IRR. This causes interrupts from device to be lost during
> CPU offline. The issue was found when explicitly setting MSI affinity to a
> CPU and immediately offlining it. It was simple to recreate with a USB
> ethernet device and doing I/O to it while the CPU is offlined. Lost
> interrupts happen even when Interrupt Remapping is enabled.
New lines exist for a reason. They help to structure information. For
the content, please see below.
> Current code does apic_soft_disable() before migrating interrupts.
>
> native_cpu_disable()
> {
> ...
> apic_soft_disable();
> cpu_disable_common();
> --> fixup_irqs(); // Too late to capture anything in IRR.
> }
>
> Just flipping the above call sequence seems to hit the IRR checks
> and the lost interrupt is fixed for both legacy MSI and when
> interrupt remapping is enabled.
Seems to hit? Come on, we really want changelogs which are based on
facts and not on assumptions.
Aside of that, yes that's a really subtle one and thanks for tracking it
down! For some reason I never looked at that ordering, but now that you
stick it in front of me, it's pretty clear that this is the root cause.
> /*
> * Disable the local APIC. Otherwise IPI broadcasts will reach
> * it. It still responds normally to INIT, NMI, SMI, and SIPI
> - * messages.
> + * messages. It's important to do apic_soft_disable() after
> + * fixup_irqs(), because fixup_irqs() called from cpu_disable_common()
> + * depends on IRR being set.
That sentence does not make sense to me.
> + .... After apic_soft_disable() CPU preserves
> + * currently set IRR/ISR but new interrupts will not set IRR.
I agree with the IRR part, but ISR is simply impossible to be set in
this situation.
> + * This causes interrupts sent to outgoing CPU before completion
> + * of IRQ migration to be lost. Check SDM Vol 3 "10.4.7.2 Local
> + * APIC State after It Has been Software Disabled" section for more
> + * details.
Please do not use the SDM chapter number of today. It's going to be a
different one with the next version.
Something like this perhaps?
/*
* Disable the local APIC. Otherwise IPI broadcasts will reach
* it. It still responds normally to INIT, NMI, SMI, and SIPI
* messages.
*
* Disabling the APIC must happen after cpu_disable_common()
* which invokes fixup_irqs().
*
* Disabling the APIC preserves already set bits in IRR, but
* an interrupt arriving after disabling the local APIC does not
* set the corresponding IRR bit.
*
* fixup_irqs() scans IRR for set bits so it can raise a not
* yet handled interrupt on the new destination CPU via an IPI
* but obviously it can't do so for IRR bits which are not set.
* IOW, interrupts arriving after disabling the local APIC will
* be lost.
*/
Hmm?
The changelog wants to have a corresponding update.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists