linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: update kzfree script to kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3da343e9-bf5f-abe4-8b43-af98bd72e131@linux.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:12:50 +0300
From:   Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: update kzfree script to kfree_sensitive

Ping?

On 8/11/20 10:49 AM, Denis Efremov wrote:
> Commit 453431a54934 ("mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()")
> renames kzfree to kfree_sensitive and uses memzero_explicit(...) instead of
> memset(..., 0, ...) internally. Update cocci script to reflect these
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
> ---
> Julia, I think you can squash this commit with original script, or I can
> resend the whole script since it's not merged to the mainline.
> 
>  .../{kzfree.cocci => kfree_sensitive.cocci}   | 29 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>  rename scripts/coccinelle/api/{kzfree.cocci => kfree_sensitive.cocci} (70%)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/kzfree.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/kfree_sensitive.cocci
> similarity index 70%
> rename from scripts/coccinelle/api/kzfree.cocci
> rename to scripts/coccinelle/api/kfree_sensitive.cocci
> index 33625bd7cec9..e4a066a0b77d 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/kzfree.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/kfree_sensitive.cocci
> @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  ///
> -/// Use kzfree, kvfree_sensitive rather than memset or
> -/// memzero_explicit followed by kfree
> +/// Use kfree_sensitive, kvfree_sensitive rather than memset or
> +/// memzero_explicit followed by kfree.
>  ///
>  // Confidence: High
>  // Copyright: (C) 2020 Denis Efremov ISPRAS
>  // Options: --no-includes --include-headers
>  //
> -// Keywords: kzfree, kvfree_sensitive
> +// Keywords: kfree_sensitive, kvfree_sensitive
>  //
>  
>  virtual context
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ virtual report
>  @initialize:python@
>  @@
>  # kmalloc_oob_in_memset uses memset to explicitly trigger out-of-bounds access
> -filter = frozenset(['kmalloc_oob_in_memset', 'kzfree', 'kvfree_sensitive'])
> +filter = frozenset(['kmalloc_oob_in_memset',
> +		    'kfree_sensitive', 'kvfree_sensitive'])
>  
>  def relevant(p):
>      return not (filter & {el.current_element for el in p})
> @@ -56,17 +57,13 @@ type T;
>  - memzero_explicit@m((T)E, size);
>    ... when != E
>        when strict
> -// TODO: uncomment when kfree_sensitive will be merged.
> -// Only this case is commented out because developers
> -// may not like patches like this since kzfree uses memset
> -// internally (not memzero_explicit).
> -//(
> -//- kfree(E)@p;
> -//+ kfree_sensitive(E);
> -//|
> +(
> +- kfree(E)@p;
> ++ kfree_sensitive(E);
> +|
>  - \(vfree\|kvfree\)(E)@p;
>  + kvfree_sensitive(E, size);
> -//)
> +)
>  
>  @rp_memset depends on patch@
>  expression E, size;
> @@ -80,7 +77,7 @@ type T;
>        when strict
>  (
>  - kfree(E)@p;
> -+ kzfree(E);
> ++ kfree_sensitive(E);
>  |
>  - \(vfree\|kvfree\)(E)@p;
>  + kvfree_sensitive(E, size);
> @@ -91,11 +88,11 @@ p << r.p;
>  @@
>  
>  coccilib.report.print_report(p[0],
> -  "WARNING: opportunity for kzfree/kvfree_sensitive")
> +  "WARNING: opportunity for kfree_sensitive/kvfree_sensitive")
>  
>  @script:python depends on org@
>  p << r.p;
>  @@
>  
>  coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],
> -  "WARNING: opportunity for kzfree/kvfree_sensitive")
> +  "WARNING: opportunity for kfree_sensitive/kvfree_sensitive")
>