[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c32f6b5-deb6-e310-4bc4-a871719cc8f3@st.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:57:15 +0200
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <jic23@...nel.org>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device
lock
On 8/26/20 8:38 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
>
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock on the device's state structure.
>
> The patch also does a minor whitespace change to align the 'lock' with the
> 'common' field via tabs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> index 092c796fa3d9..fc636812c17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,11 @@
> /**
> * struct stm32_dac - private data of DAC driver
> * @common: reference to DAC common data
> + * @lock: lock to protect the data buffer during regmap ops
Hi Alexandru,
I think the same patch has been sent by Sergiu already [1].
Jonathan and I had a minor comment at that time: E.g. could you please
update the comment ?
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/18/254
> */
> struct stm32_dac {
> - struct stm32_dac_common *common;
> + struct stm32_dac_common *common;
Is above change needed?
Best Regards,
Fabrice
> + struct mutex lock;
> };
>
> static int stm32_dac_is_enabled(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel)
> @@ -58,10 +60,10 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch,
> int ret;
>
> /* already enabled / disabled ? */
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&dac->lock);
> ret = stm32_dac_is_enabled(indio_dev, ch);
> if (ret < 0 || enable == !!ret) {
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> @@ -69,13 +71,13 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch,
> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> return ret;
> }
> }
>
> ret = regmap_update_bits(dac->common->regmap, STM32_DAC_CR, msk, en);
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "%s failed\n", en ?
> "Enable" : "Disable");
> @@ -327,6 +329,8 @@ static int stm32_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> indio_dev->info = &stm32_dac_iio_info;
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>
> + mutex_init(&dac->lock);
> +
> ret = stm32_dac_chan_of_init(indio_dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists