linux-kernel - Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200826180645.9b609fc05df2a149564df1b8@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:06:45 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function
 entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)

On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:22:39 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:07:09 +0000
> "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: peterz@...radead.org <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 8:09 PM
> > > To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Eddy Wu (RD-TW) <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org; David S. Miller
> > > <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
> > >
> > > Surely we can do a lockless list for this. We have llist_add() and
> > > llist_del_first() to make a lockless LIFO/stack.
> > >
> > 
> > llist operations require atomic cmpxchg, for some arch doesn't have CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, in_nmi() check might still needed.
> > (HAVE_KRETPROBES && !CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG): arc, arm, csky, mips
> 
> Good catch. In those cases, we can add in_nmi() check at arch dependent code.

Oops, in_nmi() check is needed in pre_kretprobe_handler() which has no
arch dependent code. Hmm, so we still need an weak function to check it...

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>