[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200826114911.681967861@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:02:46 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
Richard Alpe <richard.alpe@...csson.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
syzbot+0e7181deafa7e0b79923@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 09/16] tipc: fix uninit skb->data in tipc_nl_compat_dumpit()
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 47733f9daf4fe4f7e0eb9e273f21ad3a19130487 ]
__tipc_nl_compat_dumpit() has two callers, and it expects them to
pass a valid nlmsghdr via arg->data. This header is artificial and
crafted just for __tipc_nl_compat_dumpit().
tipc_nl_compat_publ_dump() does so by putting a genlmsghdr as well
as some nested attribute, TIPC_NLA_SOCK. But the other caller
tipc_nl_compat_dumpit() does not, this leaves arg->data uninitialized
on this call path.
Fix this by just adding a similar nlmsghdr without any payload in
tipc_nl_compat_dumpit().
This bug exists since day 1, but the recent commit 6ea67769ff33
("net: tipc: prepare attrs in __tipc_nl_compat_dumpit()") makes it
easier to appear.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+0e7181deafa7e0b79923@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d0796d1ef63d ("tipc: convert legacy nl bearer dump to nl compat")
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Cc: Richard Alpe <richard.alpe@...csson.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c
+++ b/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c
@@ -275,8 +275,9 @@ err_out:
static int tipc_nl_compat_dumpit(struct tipc_nl_compat_cmd_dump *cmd,
struct tipc_nl_compat_msg *msg)
{
- int err;
+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
struct sk_buff *arg;
+ int err;
if (msg->req_type && (!msg->req_size ||
!TLV_CHECK_TYPE(msg->req, msg->req_type)))
@@ -305,6 +306,15 @@ static int tipc_nl_compat_dumpit(struct
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ nlh = nlmsg_put(arg, 0, 0, tipc_genl_family.id, 0, NLM_F_MULTI);
+ if (!nlh) {
+ kfree_skb(arg);
+ kfree_skb(msg->rep);
+ msg->rep = NULL;
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+ }
+ nlmsg_end(arg, nlh);
+
err = __tipc_nl_compat_dumpit(cmd, msg, arg);
if (err) {
kfree_skb(msg->rep);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists