lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:31:52 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Frank A. Cancio Bello" <frank@...eralsoftwareinc.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.rst: use the new SPDX
 tag

Em Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:47:33 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:28:24 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > SPDX v3.10 gained support for GFDL-1.2 with no invariant sections:
> > 
> > 	https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-invariants-only.html
> > 
> > Let's use it, instead of keeping a license text for this file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/trace/ring-buffer-design.rst | 26 +---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-)  
> 
> [CC expanded]
> 
> If we're going to do this, I think we should also add GFDL to the right
> place in the LICENSES directory - deprecated/ or at best dual/.  But even
> SPDX (https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2.html) says this license is
> deprecated.

Right. I'll send a separate patch adding it to deprecated/
together with GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later, which is used
at the media uAPI documentation. There, GFDL 1.1 is used both
together with GPL (dual licensed is required for new files) and 
alone (for the legacy document files).

> 
> Beyond that, https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-invariants-only.html seems
> to disagree with your interpretation; it seems you would want 
> GFDL-1.2-only-no-invariants ?

Thanks for reviewing! Yeah, indeed I mangled this one. It
should be, instead:

	GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-only

https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-only.html

I'll send a second version fix it.

Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ