linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: consider devices with of_match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:34:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: consider devices with of_match_table during i2c
 device probing

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18:10PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/08/26 13:23), Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:54:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:38:07PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > On (20/08/26 19:24), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > > > But then the question is why we have this code in the ->probe() at all?
> > > > > > ->match() is run before probe by bus core, no?
> > > > > 
> > > > > That's a good question.
> > > > 
> > > > Everything seem to be working OK on my test board with this patch:
> > > 
> > > I'm okay with it, but I want to hear Wolfram about this.
> > > If it gets a green light to go, feel free to add
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Sergey,
> > 
> > Can you send a proper patch (with patch description) and me and Jean
> > Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> in the To: field?
> > 
> > The origins of this matching code are pretty old and Jean is more
> > experienced there than I am. Nonetheless, I will check it, too, of
> > course.
> 
> Oh, sure, will do. Is that OK if I'll base my patch on linux-next?
> I'm also going to test the patch on more devices here on my side.

Today's one includes above mentioned patches, I think it's okay.
The i2c/for-next is currently listed
ab70935d37bb i2c: Remove 'default n' from busses/Kconfig
on top of current, don't see how it may interfere with this.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko