[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826150925.GE988805@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:09:25 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm: Convert find_get_entry to return the head page
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 07:48:48PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> There are only three callers remaining of find_get_entry().
> find_get_swap_page() is happy to get the head page instead of the subpage.
> Add find_subpage() calls to find_lock_entry() and pagecache_get_page()
> to avoid auditing all their callers.
I believe this would cause a subtle bug in memcg charge moving for pte
mapped huge pages. We currently skip over tail pages in the range
(they don't have page->mem_cgroup set) and account for the huge page
once from the headpage. After this change, we would see the headpage
and account for it 512 times (or whatever the number is on non-x86).
But that aside, I don't quite understand the intent.
Before, all these functions simply return the base page at @index,
whether it's a regular page or a tail page.
Afterwards, find_lock_entry(), find_get_page() et al still do, but
find_get_entry() returns headpage at @index & HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK.
Shouldn't we be consistent about how we handle huge pages when
somebody queries the tree for a given base page index?
[ Wouldn't that mean that e.g. find_get_swap_page() would return tail
pages for regular files and head pages for shmem files? ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists