[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200827161754.300260291@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:12:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com, x86@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
cameron@...dycamel.com, oleg@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Fix try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() semantics
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3006,15 +3006,14 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
*/
bool try_invoke_on_locked_down_task(struct task_struct *p, bool (*func)(struct task_struct *t, void *arg), void *arg)
{
- bool ret = false;
struct rq_flags rf;
+ bool ret = false;
struct rq *rq;
- lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
if (p->on_rq) {
rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
- if (task_rq(p) == rq)
+ if (task_rq(p) == rq && rq->curr != p)
ret = func(p, arg);
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
} else {
@@ -3028,7 +3027,7 @@ bool try_invoke_on_locked_down_task(stru
ret = func(p, arg);
}
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists