| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGETcx8Ums+mkD54BCkCvBtU1qx13VZH=DOPqepyiQz62REfCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:17:16 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Lockdep warning caused by "driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid
context during device link deletion"
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:50 PM Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi ALL,
>
> We met the below WARNING during system suspend on an iMX6Q SDB board
> with the latest linus/master branch (v5.9-rc1+) and next-20200820.
> v5.8 kernel is ok. So i did bisect and finally found it's caused by
> the patch below.
> Reverting it can get rid of the warning, but I wonder if there may be
> other potential issues.
> Any ideas?
>
> Defconfig used is: imx_v6_v7_defconfig
>
----- 8< ----- Snipped text that was a bit misleading
>
> Error log:
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> [ 39.111865] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> [ 39.148650] Filesystems sync: 0.032 seconds
> [ 39.154034]
> [ 39.155537] ======================================================
> [ 39.161723] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> [ 39.167911] 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37 Not tainted
> [ 39.173315] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 39.179500] sh/647 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 39.183862] c15a310c (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.191200]
> [ 39.191200] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 39.197036] c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.203582] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 39.203582]
> [ 39.211763]
> [ 39.211763] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 39.219249]
> [ 39.219249] -> #2 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.224673] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.229126] firmware_uevent+0x18/0xa0
> [ 39.233411] dev_uevent+0xc4/0x1f8
> [ 39.237343] uevent_show+0x98/0x114
> [ 39.241362] dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
> [ 39.245472] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec
> [ 39.249927] seq_read+0x138/0x550
> [ 39.253774] vfs_read+0x94/0x164
> [ 39.257529] ksys_read+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.261288] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.265564] 0xbed7c808
> [ 39.268538]
> [ 39.268538] -> #1 (kn->active#3){++++}-{0:0}:
> [ 39.274391] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x94
> [ 39.279450] device_del+0x144/0x3fc
Rafael/Greg,
I'm not very familiar with the #0 and #2 calls stacks. But poking
around a bit, they are NOT due to the device-link-device. But the new
stuff is the above two lines that are deleting the device-link-device
(that's used to expose device link details in sysfs) when the device
link is deleted.
Kicking off a workqueue to break this cycle is easy, but the problem
is that if I queue a work to delete the device, then the sysfs folder
won't get removed immediately. And if the same link is created again
before the work is completed, then there'll be a sysfs name collision
and warning.
So, I'm kinda stuck here. Open to suggestions. Hoping you'll have
better ideas for breaking the cycle. Or point out how I'm
misunderstanding the cycle here.
-Saravana
> [ 39.283467] __device_link_del+0x4c/0x70
> [ 39.287919] device_link_remove+0x5c/0x8c
> [ 39.292464] _regulator_put.part.0+0x104/0x1dc
> [ 39.297436] regulator_put+0x2c/0x3c
> [ 39.299731] regulator regulator.5: Failed to increase supply voltage: -110
> [ 39.301544] release_nodes+0x1b4/0x204
> [ 39.301553] really_probe+0x104/0x3b4
> [ 39.316881] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb4
> [ 39.321506] device_driver_attach+0x58/0x60
> [ 39.326217] __driver_attach+0x58/0xd0
> [ 39.330499] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xbc
> [ 39.334863] bus_add_driver+0x150/0x1dc
> [ 39.339227] driver_register+0x74/0x108
> [ 39.343599] i2c_register_driver+0x38/0x8c
> [ 39.348227] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x3b4
> [ 39.352598] kernel_init_freeable+0x154/0x1e4
> [ 39.357485] kernel_init+0x8/0x118
> [ 39.361415] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
> [ 39.365518] 0x0
> [ 39.367883]
> [ 39.367883] -> #0 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> [ 39.373740] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec
> [ 39.377848] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0
> [ 39.381952] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
> [ 39.386405] dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c
> [ 39.390769] fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4
> [ 39.394795] notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80
> [ 39.399420] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64
> [ 39.405003] __pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c
> [ 39.410063] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438
> [ 39.414080] state_store+0x68/0xc8
> [ 39.418013] kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c
> [ 39.419741] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.422551] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8
> [ 39.422559] ksys_write+0x60/0xe8
> [ 39.427529] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.431362] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
> [ 39.431368] 0xbeec8958
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431372] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 39.431372]
> [ 39.431375] Chain exists of:
> [ 39.431375] dpm_list_mtx --> kn->active#3 --> fw_lock
> [ 39.431375]
> [ 39.431390] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 39.431390]
> [ 39.431394] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 39.431398] ---- ----
> [ 39.431401] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.431412] lock(kn->active#3);
> [ 39.490528] lock(fw_lock);
> [ 39.495934] lock(dpm_list_mtx);
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.499255] *** DEADLOCK ***
> [ 39.499255]
> [ 39.505181] 6 locks held by sh/647:
> [ 39.508675] #0: ecf48a84 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> vfs_write+0x14c/0x1d8
> [ 39.516007] #1: ed2ced48 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd0/0x22c
> [ 39.523684] #2: ec1ff960 (kn->active#90){.+.+}-{0:0}, at:
> kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x22c
> [ 39.531620] #3: c151c4e8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
> at: pm_suspend+0x11c/0x438
> [ 39.539991] #4: c151e3f4 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at:
> __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x64
> [ 39.549753] usb_otg_vbus: disabling
> [ 39.549755] #5: c15a37e4 (fw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fw_pm_notify+0x90/0xd4
> [ 39.553264] wm8962-supply: disabling
> [ 39.560214]
> [ 39.560214] stack backtrace:
> [ 39.560225] CPU: 0 PID: 647 Comm: sh Not tainted
> 5.9.0-rc1-00103-g7eac66d0456f #37
> [ 39.560230] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
> [ 39.560260] [<c0112270>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bfd4>]
> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [ 39.560287] [<c010bfd4>] (show_stack) from [<c05af3a0>]
> (dump_stack+0xe4/0x118)
> [ 39.597365] [<c05af3a0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0185390>]
> (check_noncircular+0x130/0x1e4)
> [ 39.605386] [<c0185390>] (check_noncircular) from [<c018880c>]
> (__lock_acquire+0x161c/0x31b0)
> [ 39.613923] [<c018880c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c018ad00>]
> (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x4ec)
> [ 39.621772] [<c018ad00>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0db0bfc>]
> (__mutex_lock+0x94/0x9d0)
> [ 39.629445] [<c0db0bfc>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0db1554>]
> (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
> [ 39.637463] [<c0db1554>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c07892dc>]
> (dpm_for_each_dev+0x20/0x5c)
> [ 39.645828] [<c07892dc>] (dpm_for_each_dev) from [<c0794a60>]
> (fw_pm_notify+0xa4/0xd4)
> [ 39.653762] [<c0794a60>] (fw_pm_notify) from [<c0152c7c>]
> (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x80)
> [ 39.661954] [<c0152c7c>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c01532a8>]
> (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x64)
> [ 39.671709] [<c01532a8>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x3c)
> [ 39.679740] cpu cpu0: failed to scale vddpu up: -110
> [ 39.681897] [<c0192498>] (__pm_notifier_call_chain) from
> [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x438)
> [ 39.686859] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -110
> [ 39.695473] [<c0194424>] (pm_suspend) from [<c019235c>]
> (state_store+0x68/0xc8)
> [ 39.695490] [<c019235c>] (state_store) from [<c035af80>]
> (kernfs_fop_write+0x10c/0x22c)
> [ 39.695506] [<c035af80>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02b0e38>]
> (vfs_write+0xbc/0x1d8)
> [ 39.695524] [<c02b0e38>] (vfs_write) from [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write+0x60/0xe8)
> [ 39.704844] VGEN1: disabling
> [ 39.709627] [<c02b10a0>] (ksys_write) from [<c0100080>]
> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
> [ 39.743035] Exception stack(0xed573fa8 to 0xed573ff0)
> [ 39.748098] 3fa0: 00000004 01d3caf8 00000001
> 01d3caf8 00000004 00000000
> [ 39.756286] 3fc0: 00000004 01d3caf8 b6f40340 00000004 b6ed6c8c
> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 39.764470] 3fe0: 00000004 beec8958 b6e75d4f b6e01d16
> [ 39.770874] VGEN2: disabling
> [ 39.776106] VGEN3: disabling
>
> [ 69.590256] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db
> [ 69.590312] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.008 seconds) done.
> [ 69.606341] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 69.609599] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
> seconds) done.
> [ 69.619021] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists