[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200827200801.GB1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:08:01 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@...gle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Micah Morton <mortonm@...gle.com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] Add a "nosymfollow" mount option.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:09:46AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> From: Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>
>
> For mounts that have the new "nosymfollow" option, don't follow symlinks
> when resolving paths. The new option is similar in spirit to the
> existing "nodev", "noexec", and "nosuid" options, as well as to the
> LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS resolve flag in the openat2(2) syscall. Various BSD
> variants have been supporting the "nosymfollow" mount option for a long
> time with equivalent implementations.
>
> Note that symlinks may still be created on file systems mounted with
> the "nosymfollow" option present. readlink() remains functional, so
> user space code that is aware of symlinks can still choose to follow
> them explicitly.
>
> Setting the "nosymfollow" mount option helps prevent privileged
> writers from modifying files unintentionally in case there is an
> unexpected link along the accessed path. The "nosymfollow" option is
> thus useful as a defensive measure for systems that need to deal with
> untrusted file systems in privileged contexts.
>
> More information on the history and motivation for this patch can be
> found here:
>
> https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/hardening-against-malicious-stateful-data#TOC-Restricting-symlink-traversal
>
> Signed-off-by: Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> ---
> Changes since v8 [1]:
> * Look for MNT_NOSYMFOLLOW in link->mnt->mnt_flags so we are testing
> the link itself rather than the directory holding the link. (Al Viro)
> * Rebased onto v5.9-rc2.
AFAICS, it applies clean to -rc1; what was the rebase about?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists