lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef1931eb-5677-d92c-732d-b67b5263425d@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:32:05 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Use a unique name with
 regmap_config

Hi Marc,

+ Mark Brown

On 8/27/20 3:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Suman,
> 
> On 2020-08-27 19:28, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 8/27/20 9:46 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On 2020-07-27 22:10, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> The DT node full name is currently being used in regmap_config
>>>> which in turn is used to create the regmap debugfs directories.
>>>> This name however is not guaranteed to be unique and the regmap
>>>> debugfs registration can fail in the cases where the syscon nodes
>>>> have the same unit-address but are present in different DT node
>>>> hierarchies. Replace this logic using the syscon reg resource
>>>> address instead (inspired from logic used while creating platform
>>>> devices) to ensure a unique name is given for each syscon.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Arnd,
>>>> Lee is looking for your review on this patch. Can you please
>>>> review and provide your comments.
>>>>
>>>> This is a resend of the patch that was posted previously, rebased
>>>> now onto latest kernel.
>>>>
>>>> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11353355/
>>>>  - Fix build warning reported by kbuild test bot
>>>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11346363/
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/mfd/syscon.c | 4 +++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
>>>> index 3a97816d0cba..75859e492984 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
>>>> @@ -101,12 +101,14 @@ static struct syscon *of_syscon_register(struct
>>>> device_node *np, bool check_clk)
>>>>          }
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> -    syscon_config.name = of_node_full_name(np);
>>>> +    syscon_config.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn@...x", np,
>>>> +                       (u64)res.start);
>>>>      syscon_config.reg_stride = reg_io_width;
>>>>      syscon_config.val_bits = reg_io_width * 8;
>>>>      syscon_config.max_register = resource_size(&res) - reg_io_width;
>>>>
>>>>      regmap = regmap_init_mmio(NULL, base, &syscon_config);
>>>> +    kfree(syscon_config.name);
>>>>      if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
>>>>          pr_err("regmap init failed\n");
>>>>          ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
>>>
>>> This patch triggers some illegal memory accesses when debugfs is
>>> enabled, as regmap does rely on config->name to be persistent
>>> when the debugfs registration is deferred via regmap_debugfs_early_list
>>> (__regmap_init() -> regmap_attach_dev() -> regmap_debugfs_init()...),
>>> leading to a KASAN splat on demand.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, I missed the subtlety around the debugfs registration.
>>
>>> I came up with the following patch that solves the issue for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>         M.
>>>
>>> From fd3f5f2bf72df53be18d13914fe349a34f81f16b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>>> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:45:34 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated name for regmap_config
>>>
>>> The name allocated for the regmap_config structure is freed
>>> pretty early, right after the registration of the MMIO region.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, that doesn't follow the life cycle that debugfs
>>> expects, as it can access the name field long after the free
>>> has occured.
>>>
>>> Move the free on the error path, and keep it forever otherwise.
>>
>> Hmm, this is exactly what I was trying to avoid. The regmap_init does duplicate
>> the name into map->name if config->name is given, and the regmap debugfs makes
>> another copy of its own into debugfs_name when actually registered. If the rules
>> for regmap_init is that the config->name should be persistent, then I guess we
>> have no choice but to go with the below fix.
>>
>> Does something like below help?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
>> index e93700af7e6e..96d8a0161c89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
>> @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ struct regmap *__regmap_init(struct device *dev,
>>                 if (ret != 0)
>>                         goto err_regcache;
>>         } else {
>> -               regmap_debugfs_init(map, config->name);
>> +               regmap_debugfs_init(map, map->name);
>>
>> But there are couple of other places in regmap code that uses config->name, but
>> those won't be exercised with the syscon code.
> 
> Is config->name always the same as map->name? If so, why don't you just
> pass map once and for all? Is the lifetime of map->name the same as
> that of config->name?

map->name is created (kstrdup_const) from config->name if not NULL, so above
replacement should be exactly equivalent, map is filled in _regmap_init. But it
does make the regmap_debugfs_init callsites in the file look dissimilar.

> 
> My worry with this approach is that we start changing stuff in a rush,
> and this would IMHO deserve a thorough investigation of whether this
> change is actually safe.
> 
> I'd rather take the safe approach of either keeping the memory around
> until we clearly understand what the implications are (and probably
> this should involve the regmap maintainer), or to revert this patch
> until we figure out the actual life cycle of the various names.

Yeah, agreed. Let's see what Mark suggests.

Mark,
Can you clarify the lifecycle expectations on the config->name and do you have
any suggestions here?

regards
Suman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ