[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Dp28MSjQugWCwqfor=eEPvy+EfuoVL0y_oirw=G600aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:27:07 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: tqma6: minor fixes
Hi Matthias,
(Your mailer is messing the threading.)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:31 AM Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> Ah, I see.
>
> Nevertheless, hardware that uses the native chipselects of newer chips
> exists (for example our TQ-Systems starterkit mainboards, the DTS of
> which we're currently preparing for mainline submission). Shouldn't
> num-cs be set for boards (or SoM DTSI) where not all CS pins of the SoC
> are usable?
>
> In any case, my original question was about the intended logic for
> num_chipselects for SPI drivers. My proposal was:
>
> - If num-cs is set, use that
> - If num-cs is unset, use the number of cs-gpios
> - If num-cs is unset and no cs-gpios are defined, use a driver-provided
> default
>
> How do other SPI controller drivers deal with this?
I think it would be better to discuss this in the spi mailing list
with Mark Brown and the dt maintainer, Rob Herring.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists