[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200827063748.GA12096@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:37:48 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...itsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Kill DCACHE_DONTCACHE dentry even if
DCACHE_REFERENCED is set
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:59:53AM +0800, Hao Li wrote:
> Currently, DCACHE_REFERENCED prevents the dentry with DCACHE_DONTCACHE
> set from being killed, so the corresponding inode can't be evicted. If
> the DAX policy of an inode is changed, we can't make policy changing
> take effects unless dropping caches manually.
>
> This patch fixes this problem and flushes the inode to disk to prepare
> for evicting it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 3 ++-
> fs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index ea0485861d93..486c7409dc82 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -796,7 +796,8 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry)
> */
> smp_rmb();
> d_flags = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_flags);
> - d_flags &= DCACHE_REFERENCED | DCACHE_LRU_LIST | DCACHE_DISCONNECTED;
> + d_flags &= DCACHE_REFERENCED | DCACHE_LRU_LIST | DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
> + | DCACHE_DONTCACHE;
Seems reasonable, but you need to update the comment above as to
how this flag fits into this code....
> /* Nothing to do? Dropping the reference was all we needed? */
> if (d_flags == (DCACHE_REFERENCED | DCACHE_LRU_LIST) && !d_unhashed(dentry))
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 72c4c347afb7..5218a8aebd7f 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
> }
>
> state = inode->i_state;
> - if (!drop) {
> + if (!drop || (drop && (inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE))) {
> WRITE_ONCE(inode->i_state, state | I_WILL_FREE);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
What's this supposed to do? We'll only get here with drop set if the
filesystem is mounting or unmounting. In either case, why does
having I_DONTCACHE set require the inode to be written back here
before it is evicted from the cache?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists