[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPeg0_1gFZWhEvb-LwCiCvEuaZcZ2TQa256ntvuLecF_pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:36:53 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
wens@...e.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] mfd: ipaq-micro: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 at 05:28, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
> ---
> changes in v2 :
> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. If IRQ0 is not valid.
> changes in v3 :
> return -EINVAL insted of irq.
>
> drivers/mfd/ipaq-micro.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Arvind,
This was never applied. Can you rebase and resend the entire series?
Or maybe there was a reason to drop it?
Best Regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists