[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159851486318.20229.14949275173019468028.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:54:23 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Randy Dunlap" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: locking/core] seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a28e884b966e713da29caefbb347efea77367d22
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a28e884b966e713da29caefbb347efea77367d22
Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:02:00 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:42:02 +02:00
seqlock: Fix multiple kernel-doc warnings
Fix kernel-doc warnings in <linux/seqlock.h>.
../include/linux/seqlock.h:152: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
../include/linux/seqlock.h:164: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: * SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'seq_name' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'assoc_lock' not described in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'name' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:229: warning: Excess function parameter 'lock' description in 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO'
../include/linux/seqlock.h:695: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
Demote kernel-doc notation for the macros "seqcount_LOCKNAME_init()" and
"SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE()"; scripts/kernel-doc does not handle them correctly.
Rename function parameters in SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO() documentation
to match the macro's argument names. Change the macro name in the
documentation to SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE_ZERO() to match the macro's name.
For raw_write_seqcount_latch(), rename the second NOTE: to NOTE2:
to prevent a kernel-doc warning. However, the generated output is not
quite as nice as it could be for this.
Fix a typo: s/LOCKTYPR/LOCKTYPE/
Fixes: 0efc94c5d15c ("seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()")
Fixes: e4e9ab3f9f91 ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition")
Fixes: a8772dccb2ec ("seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817000200.20993-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 962d976..300cbf3 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s)
#endif
/**
- * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPR associated
+ * typedef seqcount_LOCKNAME_t - sequence counter with LOCKTYPE associated
* @seqcount: The real sequence counter
* @lock: Pointer to the associated spinlock
*
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s)
* that the write side critical section is properly serialized.
*/
-/**
+/*
* seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() - runtime initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
* @s: Pointer to the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance
* @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, false, s->lock)
SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock)
SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base)
-/**
+/*
* SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
* @name: Name of the seqcount_LOCKNAME_t instance
* @lock: Pointer to the associated LOCKTYPE
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static inline int raw_read_seqcount_t_latch(seqcount_t *s)
* to miss an entire modification sequence, once it resumes it might
* observe the new entry.
*
- * NOTE:
+ * NOTE2:
*
* When data is a dynamic data structure; one should use regular RCU
* patterns to manage the lifetimes of the objects within.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists