| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <159851486108.20229.15945468647290456258.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:54:21 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Boqun Feng" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: locking/core] lockdep: Make __bfs() visit every dependency
until a match
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d563bc6ead9e79be37067d58509a605b67378184
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d563bc6ead9e79be37067d58509a605b67378184
Author: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:42:23 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:42:03 +02:00
lockdep: Make __bfs() visit every dependency until a match
Currently, __bfs() will do a breadth-first search in the dependency
graph and visit each lock class in the graph exactly once, so for
example, in the following graph:
A ---------> B
| ^
| |
+----------> C
a __bfs() call starts at A, will visit B through dependency A -> B and
visit C through dependency A -> C and that's it, IOW, __bfs() will not
visit dependency C -> B.
This is OK for now, as we only have strong dependencies in the
dependency graph, so whenever there is a traverse path from A to B in
__bfs(), it means A has strong dependencies to B (IOW, B depends on A
strongly). So no need to visit all dependencies in the graph.
However, as we are going to add recursive-read lock into the dependency
graph, as a result, not all the paths mean strong dependencies, in the
same example above, dependency A -> B may be a weak dependency and
traverse A -> C -> B may be a strong dependency path. And with the old
way of __bfs() (i.e. visiting every lock class exactly once), we will
miss the strong dependency path, which will result into failing to find
a deadlock. To cure this for the future, we need to find a way for
__bfs() to visit each dependency, rather than each class, exactly once
in the search until we find a match.
The solution is simple:
We used to mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate a
class has been visited in __bfs(), now we change the semantics a little
bit: we now mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate _all
the dependencies_ in its lock_{after,before} have been visited in the
__bfs() (note we only take one direction in a __bfs() search). In this
way, every dependency is guaranteed to be visited until we find a match.
Note: the checks in mark_lock_accessed() and lock_accessed() are
removed, because after this modification, we may call these two
functions on @source_entry of __bfs(), which may not be the entry in
"list_entries"
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 462c68c..150686a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1421,23 +1421,19 @@ static inline unsigned int __cq_get_elem_count(struct circular_queue *cq)
return (cq->rear - cq->front) & CQ_MASK;
}
-static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock,
- struct lock_list *parent)
+static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock)
{
- unsigned long nr;
+ lock->class->dep_gen_id = lockdep_dependency_gen_id;
+}
- nr = lock - list_entries;
- WARN_ON(nr >= ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
+static inline void visit_lock_entry(struct lock_list *lock,
+ struct lock_list *parent)
+{
lock->parent = parent;
- lock->class->dep_gen_id = lockdep_dependency_gen_id;
}
static inline unsigned long lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock)
{
- unsigned long nr;
-
- nr = lock - list_entries;
- WARN_ON(nr >= ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
return lock->class->dep_gen_id == lockdep_dependency_gen_id;
}
@@ -1540,26 +1536,39 @@ static enum bfs_result __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
goto exit;
}
+ /*
+ * If we have visited all the dependencies from this @lock to
+ * others (iow, if we have visited all lock_list entries in
+ * @lock->class->locks_{after,before}) we skip, otherwise go
+ * and visit all the dependencies in the list and mark this
+ * list accessed.
+ */
+ if (lock_accessed(lock))
+ continue;
+ else
+ mark_lock_accessed(lock);
+
head = get_dep_list(lock, offset);
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, head, entry) {
- if (!lock_accessed(entry)) {
- unsigned int cq_depth;
- mark_lock_accessed(entry, lock);
- if (match(entry, data)) {
- *target_entry = entry;
- ret = BFS_RMATCH;
- goto exit;
- }
-
- if (__cq_enqueue(cq, entry)) {
- ret = BFS_EQUEUEFULL;
- goto exit;
- }
- cq_depth = __cq_get_elem_count(cq);
- if (max_bfs_queue_depth < cq_depth)
- max_bfs_queue_depth = cq_depth;
+ unsigned int cq_depth;
+
+ visit_lock_entry(entry, lock);
+ if (match(entry, data)) {
+ *target_entry = entry;
+ ret = BFS_RMATCH;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
+ if (__cq_enqueue(cq, entry)) {
+ ret = BFS_EQUEUEFULL;
+ goto exit;
}
+ cq_depth = __cq_get_elem_count(cq);
+ if (max_bfs_queue_depth < cq_depth)
+ max_bfs_queue_depth = cq_depth;
}
}
exit:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists