lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:51:43 -0700 From: Sean O'Brien <seobrien@...omium.org> To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei-Ning Huang <wnhuang@...gle.com>, Sean O'Brien <seobrien@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: google: add google vivaldi HID driver > I actually believe we should follow the standard convention here, and have > just one hid-<vendor> driver for all google products. Currently we have > hid-google-hammer, and this would add hid-google-vivaldi. Would you (or > Wei-Ning, CCing here) object on merging these two together? I'm a bit reluctant to merge them. Partly because I'm not familiar with the hid-google-hammer driver, but mostly because this driver is intended to handle non-google products which will use a google-defined usage code. Perhaps I should drop "google" from the driver name? Thanks, Sean O'Brien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists