lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200827090220.GH1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:02:20 +0200
From:   peterz@...radead.org
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function
 entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:15:55PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

> Yeah, kretprobe already provided the per-instance data (as far as
> I know, only systemtap depends on it). We need to provide it for
> such users.

Well, systemtap is out of tree, we don't _need_ to provide anything for
them. Furthermore, the function-graph tracer's ret_stack, which you said
you wanted to integrate with, also doesn't provide this.

Ditching it makes things simpler in that all kretprobe_instance's will
be the same and we no longer need per kretprobe storage of them.

Anyway, let me try and preserve them for now...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ