[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eec0c7d2-87f3-1213-dec1-bb34c5bde35a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:36:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Broadcom WiFi SDIO performance regression after commit "mmc:
sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet"
27.08.2020 09:45, Adrian Hunter пишет:
> On 27/08/20 9:07 am, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I was debugging WiFi performance problems on Acer A500 tablet device
>> that has BCM4329 WiFi chip which is connected to NVIDIA Terga20 SoC via
>> SDIO and found that the following commit causes a solid 5-10 Mbit/s of
>> WiFi throughput regression after 5.2 kernel:
>
> What is that in percentage terms?
That is about 20%.
>> commit c07a48c2651965e84d35cf193dfc0e5f7892d612
>> Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>> Date: Fri Apr 5 15:40:20 2019 +0300
>>
>> mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet
>>
>> Remove finish_tasklet. Requests that require DMA-unmapping or
>> sdhci_reset
>> are completed either in the IRQ thread or a workqueue if the
>> completion is
>> not initiated by the IRQ.
>>
>> Reverting the offending commit on top of recent linux-next resolves the
>> problem.
>>
>> Ulf / Adrian, do you have any ideas what could be done in regards to
>> restoring the SDIO performance? Should we just revert the offending commit?
>>
>
> Unfortunately I think we are past the point of returning to the tasklet.
>
> sdhci can complete requests in the irq handler but only if ->pre_req() and
> ->post_req() are used, which is not supported by SDIO at present. pre_req
> and post_req were introduced to reduce latency for the block driver, so it
> seems reasonable perhaps to look at using them in SDIO as well.
>
I'll try to take a look at pre/post_req(), but I'm not very familiar
with the MMC code, so it may take quite some time. Will be great if you
could help with making a patch that I could test!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists