| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1598523584-25601-1-git-send-email-zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:19:44 +0800
From: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Optimized fget to improve performance
From: Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>
It is well known that the performance of atomic_add is better than that of
atomic_cmpxchg.
The initial value of @f_count is 1. While @f_count is increased by 1 in
__fget_files, it will go through three phases: > 0, < 0, and = 0. When the
fixed value 0 is used as the condition for terminating the increase of 1,
only atomic_cmpxchg can be used. When we use < 0 as the condition for
stopping plus 1, we can use atomic_add to obtain better performance.
we test syscall in unixbench on Huawei Kunpeng920(arm64). We've got a 132%
performance boost.
with this patch and the patch [1]
System Call Overhead 9516926.2 lps (10.0 s, 1 samples)
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
System Call Overhead 15000.0 9516926.2 6344.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 6344.6
with this patch and without the patch [1]
System Call Overhead 5290449.3 lps (10.0 s, 1 samples)
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5290449.3 3527.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 3527.0
without any patch
System Call Overhead 4102310.5 lps (10.0 s, 1 samples)
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4102310.5 2734.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 2734.9
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/24/283
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
---
Hi Rong,
Can you help to test this patch individually and with [1] together on
your platform please? [1] has been tested on your platform[2].
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/8/227
include/linux/fs.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e019ea2f1347..2a9c2a30dc58 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -972,8 +972,19 @@ static inline struct file *get_file(struct file *f)
atomic_long_inc(&f->f_count);
return f;
}
+
+static inline bool get_file_unless_negative(atomic_long_t *v, long a)
+{
+ long c = atomic_long_read(v);
+
+ if (c <= 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return atomic_long_add_return(a, v) - 1;
+}
+
#define get_file_rcu_many(x, cnt) \
- atomic_long_add_unless(&(x)->f_count, (cnt), 0)
+ get_file_unless_negative(&(x)->f_count, (cnt))
#define get_file_rcu(x) get_file_rcu_many((x), 1)
#define file_count(x) atomic_long_read(&(x)->f_count)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists