[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64580e3b9acada6ff4ae9fdef02ac304@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:35:06 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Actions
SIRQ controller binding
On 2020-08-27 11:06, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:48:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:42 PM Cristian Ciocaltea
>> <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Ultimately the GIC trigger type has to be
>> something. Is it fixed or passed thru? If the latter, just use 0
>> (IRQ_TYPE_NONE) if the GIC trigger mode is not fixed. Having some sort
>> of translation of the trigger is pretty common.
>
> Yes, as explained above, the SIRQ controller performs indeed the
> translation of the incoming signal. So if I understand correctly, your
> suggestion would be to use the following inside the sirq node:
>
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, /* SIRQ0 */
> [...]
Please don't. If you are describing a GIC interrupt, use a
trigger that actually exists. Given that you have a 1:1
mapping between input and output, just encode the output
trigger that matches the input.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists