[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iTmowt48RHZGrx6aFm4OsJ0FXHk1WWstAJ=hvc7oJ_dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:54:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq()
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:24 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> "cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
> if (freq)
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> - else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
> - cpufreq_driver->get)
> + else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
> else
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
> --
This and the [2/2] applied, the latter with some minor edits in the
subject/changelog.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists