[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e950898e-0a07-4f75-2640-ec8039d81464@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:43:06 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangn1985@...look.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: meson: cards: deal dpcm flag change
Hi Jerome,
On 31.07.2020 14:06, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> Commit b73287f0b074 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: dpcm: fix playback/capture checks")
> changed the meaning of dpcm_playback/dpcm_capture and now requires the
> CPU DAI BE to aligned with those flags.
>
> This broke all Amlogic cards with uni-directional backends (All gx and
> most axg cards).
>
> While I'm still confused as to how this change is an improvement, those
> cards can't remain broken forever. Hopefully, next time an API change is
> done like that, all the users will be updated as part of the change, and
> not left to fend for themselves.
>
> Fixes: b73287f0b074 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: dpcm: fix playback/capture checks")
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
This patch landed finally in v5.9-rc1. I've noticed it causes a
following warning on Hardkernel's Odroid N2 board
(arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dtb):
meson-drm ff900000.vpu: [drm] fb0: mesondrmfb frame buffer device
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 66 at sound/soc/soc-core.c:817
snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
Modules linked in: dw_hdmi_i2s_audio dw_hdmi_cec meson_gxl realtek
dwmac_generic crct10dif_ce snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card
snd_soc_meson_card_utils rc_odroid pwm_meson meson_ir
snd_soc_meson_g12a_toacodec snd_soc_meson_axg_tdmout rtc_meson_vrtc
snd_soc_meson_g12a_tohdmitx snd_soc_meson_codec_glue mdio_mux_meson_g12a
snd_soc_meson_axg_tdmin dwmac_meson8b stmmac_platform
reset_meson_audio_arb snd_soc_meson_axg_frddr axg_audio
snd_soc_meson_axg_toddr sclk_div clk_phase meson_rng stmmac rng_core
meson_dw_hdmi snd_soc_meson_axg_fifo meson_drm meson_canvas mdio_xpcs
dw_hdmi snd_soc_meson_t9015 display_connector nvmem_meson_efuse
snd_soc_meson_axg_tdm_interface snd_soc_meson_axg_tdm_formatter
snd_soc_simple_amplifier
CPU: 3 PID: 66 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1 #1527
Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-N2 (DT)
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
pc : snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
lr : snd_soc_find_dai+0xe0/0xf0
...
Call trace:
snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities+0x68/0x160
axg_card_add_link+0x188/0x5c4 [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card]
meson_card_probe+0x1e0/0x960 [snd_soc_meson_card_utils]
platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
really_probe+0x110/0x400
driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
__device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
__device_attach+0xec/0x150
device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
worker_thread+0x48/0x460
kthread+0x134/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
irq event stamp: 269690
hardirqs last enabled at (269689): [<ffff800010f6048c>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x7c/0x98
hardirqs last disabled at (269690): [<ffff800010025a68>]
do_debug_exception+0x140/0x26c
softirqs last enabled at (269318): [<ffff800010001654>]
efi_header_end+0x654/0x6d4
softirqs last disabled at (269313): [<ffff80001008929c>]
irq_exit+0x16c/0x178
---[ end trace 56a3ea4fa00c37c8 ]---
...
axg-sound-card sound: ASoC: no DMI vendor name!
The warning is repeated 10 times.
The bisect between v5.8-rc1 and v5.9-rc1 points to the commit
c8f7dbdbaa15 ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'asoc/for-5.8' into
asoc-linus"), which introduced a branch with this patch.
The commit with this patch is applied on the earlier kernel release
(da3f23fde9d7 "ASoC: meson: cards: deal dpcm flag change" on top of
v5.7-rc1) worked fine, so it looks that there is an interference with
something merged later.
If I revert this patch on top of v5.9-rc1 or current linux-next, the
warning is gone. Let me know how I can help debugging this issue.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists