[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200827132016.GA4384@kozik-lap>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:20:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Security Officers <security@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add security docs to SECURITY CONTACT
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > When changing the documents related to kernel security workflow, notify
> > the security mailing list as its concerned by this.
> >
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 8107b3d5d6df..a1e07d0f3205 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -15620,6 +15620,8 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/sed*
> >
> > SECURITY CONTACT
> > M: Security Officers <security@...nel.org>
> > +F: Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst
> > +F: Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
>
> The hardware-issues document is "owned" by a different group of
> suckers^Wdevelopers, that is independant of security@k.o, so that file
> shouldn't be added to them here.
True, but isn't this broader security group involved in designing and
discussing the HW security process?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists