linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 01/20] gpiolib: cdev: desc_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200827140020.159627-2-warthog618@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:00:01 +0800
From:   Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        bgolaszewski@...libre.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/20] gpiolib: cdev: desc_to_lineinfo should set info offset

Set the value of the line info offset in desc_to_lineinfo, rather than
relying on it being passed in the info.  This makes the function behave
as you would expect from the name - it generates the line info
corresponding to a given GPIO desc.

Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
---

There are some instances where this results in the offset being set when
it is already set in the info, but this is clearer especially considering
that, as part of the replacement of strncpy with strscpy and to ensure
kernel stack cannot be leaked to userspace, the info is initially zeroed
in a subsequent patch.

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index e6c9b78adfc2..e95e3eab9867 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc,
 	bool ok_for_pinctrl;
 	unsigned long flags;

+	info->line_offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
 	/*
 	 * This function takes a mutex so we must check this before taking
 	 * the spinlock.
@@ -933,7 +934,6 @@ static int lineinfo_changed_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;

 	memset(&chg, 0, sizeof(chg));
-	chg.info.line_offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
 	chg.event_type = action;
 	chg.timestamp = ktime_get_ns();
 	gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(desc, &chg.info);
-- 
2.28.0