linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 6/8] x86/tsc: Use seqcount_latch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200827114044.11173-7-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:40:42 +0200
From:   "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/8] x86/tsc: Use seqcount_latch_t

Latch sequence counters have unique read and write APIs, and thus
seqcount_latch_t was recently introduced at seqlock.h.

Use that new data type instead of plain seqcount_t. This adds the
necessary type-safety and ensures that only latching-safe seqcount APIs
are to be used.

Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 49d925043171..cbf17e9f1d03 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct clocksource *art_related_clocksource;
 
 struct cyc2ns {
 	struct cyc2ns_data data[2];	/*  0 + 2*16 = 32 */
-	seqcount_t	   seq;		/* 32 + 4    = 36 */
+	seqcount_latch_t   seq;		/* 32 + 4    = 36 */
 
 }; /* fits one cacheline */
 
@@ -68,19 +68,21 @@ early_param("tsc_early_khz", tsc_early_khz_setup);
 
 __always_inline void cyc2ns_read_begin(struct cyc2ns_data *data)
 {
+	seqcount_latch_t *seqcount;
 	int seq, idx;
 
 	preempt_disable_notrace();
 
+	seqcount = &this_cpu_ptr(&cyc2ns)->seq;
 	do {
-		seq = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.seq.sequence);
+		seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(seqcount);
 		idx = seq & 1;
 
 		data->cyc2ns_offset = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_offset);
 		data->cyc2ns_mul    = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_mul);
 		data->cyc2ns_shift  = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.data[idx].cyc2ns_shift);
 
-	} while (unlikely(seq != this_cpu_read(cyc2ns.seq.sequence)));
+	} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(seqcount, seq));
 }
 
 __always_inline void cyc2ns_read_end(void)
@@ -186,7 +188,7 @@ static void __init cyc2ns_init_boot_cpu(void)
 {
 	struct cyc2ns *c2n = this_cpu_ptr(&cyc2ns);
 
-	seqcount_init(&c2n->seq);
+	seqcount_latch_init(&c2n->seq);
 	__set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, smp_processor_id(), rdtsc());
 }
 
@@ -203,7 +205,7 @@ static void __init cyc2ns_init_secondary_cpus(void)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (cpu != this_cpu) {
-			seqcount_init(&c2n->seq);
+			seqcount_latch_init(&c2n->seq);
 			c2n = per_cpu_ptr(&cyc2ns, cpu);
 			c2n->data[0] = data[0];
 			c2n->data[1] = data[1];
-- 
2.28.0