[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5682daf68b94be288c05f859942ce06deec2b022.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:01:50 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] z2ram: reindent
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 09:21 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > @@ -109,34 +111,28 @@ static void get_z2ram(void)
> ...
> > }
> > -
> > - return;
> > }
> >
>
> It would be good to have a semantic patch for that change.
>
> >
> > - if (z2ram_map[z2ram_size] == 0) {
> > + if (z2ram_map[z2ram_size] == 0)
> > break;
> > - }
> >
>
> And that one.
>
> Reason being, a semantic patch only has to be debugged once, whereas
> manual churn has to be done correctly over and over again.
checkpatch already does this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists