[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbba0345-f1e3-a240-eaca-d67fa5f8259b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:32:10 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
LINUX-WATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: Convert SP805 to Json-schema (and fix
users)
On 8/28/20 2:28 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 1:34 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/28/20 6:05 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> This is an attempt to convert the SP805 watchdog DT binding to yaml.
>>> This is done in the first patch, the remaining nine fix some DT users.
>>>
>>> I couldn't test any of those DT files on actual machines, but tried
>>> to make the changes in a way that would be transparent to at least the
>>> Linux driver. The only other SP805 DT user I could find is U-Boot, which
>>> seems to only use a very minimal subset of the binding (just the first
>>> clock).
>>> I only tried to fix those DTs that were easily and reliably fixable.
>>> AFAICT, a missing primecell compatible string, for instance, would
>>> prevent the Linux driver from probing the device at all, so I didn't
>>> dare to touch those DTs at all. Missing clocks are equally fatal.
>>
>> What is the plan for merging this series? Should Rob pick up all changes
>> or since those are non critical changes, should we just leave it to the
>> SoC maintainers to pick up the changes in their tree?
>
> I don't take .dts files. Either subarch maintainers can pick up
> individual patches or send a PR to SoC maintainers.
OK, so we are fine, to say make sure this all lands in v5.10-rc1 at some
point and the warnings should no longer exist by then?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists