linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v36 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200828233928.GA39420@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Aug 2020 02:39:28 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>,
        Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
        Seth Moore <sethmo@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 06:15:27PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:24:36PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > I have not checked if this passes checkpatch.pl yet, but I would
> > be surprised if that did not pass (obviously I'll check that).
> 
> Right, when you're done with the patchset, just do
> 
> checkpatch.pl -g ...
> 
> on it before sending and you'll be good to go. Just remember to read the
> suggestions checkpatch gives with turned on brain and sanity-check them
> instead of blindly following them.
> 
> > I'm sorry about that. This was not intentional. I'll revisit them by
> > going through all your responses from here:
> > 
> >   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11581715/
> 
> Actually this one:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200617220844.57423-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
> 
> i.e., the v33 version.

Ya, pasted wrong link, sorry :-)

> 
> Also, make sure you go through the review comments of v34 and v35 in
> case you haven't done so yet.

I'll re-check them before I send a new version.

> > v34 had the splitting of the big driver patch into multiple patches.
> > 
> > During that process I've obviously failed to address these.
> 
> Yeah, that can happen - I mean, this is not even close to being an easy
> patchset so thanks for putting in the effort.

I'd guess that this will get less painful given that the patches are now
more reasonably sizeda after chopping the driver patch.

> 
> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

/Jarkko