lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200828073650.kq4qaon2u4xsqqlr@beryllium.lan>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:36:50 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To:     Daniel Vacek <neelx.g@...il.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9-rc2-rt1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> Maybe the threshold is 33554432, eg. 32 megs...

I've rearranged the load addresses for the kernel and the dtb and now
the board is booting again. Starting with a full test run now.

The size list was mainly to see if the v5.9 tree is showing abnormal
size regression. It doesn't look that's the case. All RT kernels are
bigger than the rest.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ