linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9-rc2-rt1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:36:50 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To:     Daniel Vacek <neelx.g@...il.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9-rc2-rt1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> Maybe the threshold is 33554432, eg. 32 megs...

I've rearranged the load addresses for the kernel and the dtb and now
the board is booting again. Starting with a full test run now.

The size list was mainly to see if the v5.9 tree is showing abnormal
size regression. It doesn't look that's the case. All RT kernels are
bigger than the rest.