linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move Hartmut Knaack to Credits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcz7ByVFSTeXLn7AvNcOgr=bw26mrmi=DsCfC9khro_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:30:18 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move Hartmut Knaack to Credits

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:00 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:20:58AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:25 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hartmut Knaack was an active reviewer and contributor to the IIO
> > > subsystem and drivers.  However last message on LKML from him was sent
> > > in October 2015.
> >
> > But this is not a problem we solve here. His address is invalid for a
> > long time...
>
> I did not receive any bounces so I cannot confirm it. However I can
> quote you if you are sure that email is not valid.
>
> >
> > > In thanks for Hartmut's effort, move him name to the Credits.
> > >
> > > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
> >
> > > Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>
> >
> > ...and this?!
>
> Since email is not bouncing, he might still receive it.

Hmm... I'm a bit puzzled now. It seems gmx.net has some policies in
places that make my replies to your emails (patches) bounced, but this
one is okay. Strange...

> > Reported-by: ?
>
> Reported-by is for problems/bugs, so here Suggested feels better.

Okay, works for me.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko