linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kprobes: Replace rp->free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200828194449.deaae48c36211a61822a1943@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:44:49 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com,
        x86@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, cameron@...dycamel.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kprobes: Replace rp->free_instance with
 freelist

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:18:13 +0200
peterz@...radead.org wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:13:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:48:51 +0200
> > peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > >  struct kretprobe_instance {
> > > >  	union {
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * Dodgy as heck, this relies on not clobbering freelist::refs.
> > > > +		 * llist: only clobbers freelist::next.
> > > > +		 * rcu: clobbers both, but only after rp::freelist is gone.
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		struct freelist_node freelist;
> > > >  		struct llist_node llist;
> > > > -		struct hlist_node hlist;
> > > >  		struct rcu_head rcu;
> > > >  	};
> > > 
> > > Masami, make sure to make this something like:
> > > 
> > > 	union {
> > > 		struct freelist_node freelist;
> > > 		struct rcu_head rcu;
> > > 	};
> > > 	struct llist_node llist;
> > > 
> > > for v4, because after some sleep I'm fairly sure what I wrote above was
> > > broken.
> > > 
> > > We'll only use RCU once the freelist is gone, so sharing that storage
> > > should still be okay.
> > 
> > Hmm, would you mean there is a chance that an instance belongs to
> > both freelist and llist?
> 
> So the freelist->refs thing is supposed to pin freelist->next for
> concurrent usage, but if we instantly stick it on the
> current->kretprobe_instances llist while it's still elevated, we'll
> overwrite ->next, which would be bad.

OK, I'll pick these up for my v4 series with that fix.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>