[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200828123304.GD13881@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:33:04 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 27/76] x86/sev-es: Add CPUID handling to #VC handler
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:54:22AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> >
> > Handle #VC exceptions caused by CPUID instructions. These happen in
> > early boot code when the KASLR code checks for RDTSC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> > [ jroedel@...e.de: Adapt to #VC handling framework ]
> > Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724160336.5435-27-joro@8bytes.org
> > ---
> > +
> > +static enum es_result vc_handle_cpuid(struct ghcb *ghcb,
> > + struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
> > +{
> > + struct pt_regs *regs = ctxt->regs;
> > + u32 cr4 = native_read_cr4();
> > + enum es_result ret;
> > +
> > + ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);
> > + ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
> > +
> > + if (cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE)
>
> Will this ever happen? trampoline_32bit_src will clear CR4 except for
> PAE and possibly LA57, no?
This same code is later re-used in the runtime handler and there the
check is needed :)
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists