linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/14 v1] usb: typec: tcpci: Add a getter method to retrieve tcpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200828141158.GI174928@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 17:11:58 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14 v1] usb: typec: tcpci: Add a getter method to
 retrieve tcpm_port reference

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:22:00PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Allow chip level drivers to retrieve reference to tcpm_port.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> index 9e814d454d14..7b7991c8ac87 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ struct tcpci_chip {
>  	struct tcpci_data data;
>  };
>  
> +struct tcpm_port *tcpci_get_tcpm_port(struct tcpci *tcpci)
> +{
> +	return tcpci->port;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcpci_get_tcpm_port);

I wonder if it would be better if there were tpci callbacks, or
wrappers, for the tcpm functions that the glue drivers could then use
instead of directly calling the tcpm_*() functions?  That would allow
tcpci.c to keep tabs on what is going on.

That would somehow feel like a better approach to me, but maybe it
would only complicate things. Guenter, what do you think?


thanks,

-- 
heikki