linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200828231920.4cb817dd9c624703ecfedc5d@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:19:20 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "cameron@...dycamel.com" <cameron@...dycamel.com>,
        "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:58:24 +0200
peterz@...radead.org wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:51:13PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>  
> > OK, schedule function will be the key. I guess the senario is..
> > 
> > 1) kretporbe replace the return address with kretprobe_trampoline on task1's kernel stack
> > 2) the task1 forks task2 before returning to the kretprobe_trampoline
> > 3) while copying the process with the kernel stack, task2->kretprobe_instances.first = NULL
> > 4) task2 returns to the kretprobe_trampoline
> > 5) Bomb!
> > 
> > Hmm, we need to fixup the kernel stack when copying process. 
> 
> How would that scenario have been avoided in the old code? Because there
> task2 would have a different has and not have found a kretprobe_instance
> either.

Good question, I think this bug has not been solved in old code too.
Let me check.

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>