linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: Fix a race between hugetlb sysctl handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 07:46:30 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: Fix a race between hugetlb sysctl handlers

On 8/27/20 8:11 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> There is a race between the assignment of `table->data` and write value
> to the pointer of `table->data` in the __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() on
> the other thread.
> 
> CPU0:                                 CPU1:
>                                       proc_sys_write
> hugetlb_sysctl_handler                  proc_sys_call_handler
> hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common             hugetlb_sysctl_handler
>   table->data = &tmp;                       hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common
>                                               table->data = &tmp;
>     proc_doulongvec_minmax
>       do_proc_doulongvec_minmax           sysctl_head_finish
>         __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax         unuse_table
>           i = table->data;
>           *i = val;  // corrupt CPU1's stack
> 
> Fix this by duplicating the `table`, and only update the duplicate of
> it. And introduce a helper of proc_hugetlb_doulongvec_minmax() to
> simplify the code.
> 
> The following oops was seen:
> 
>     BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
>     #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
>     #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
>     Code: Bad RIP value.
>     ...
>     Call Trace:
>      ? set_max_huge_pages+0x3da/0x4f0
>      ? alloc_pool_huge_page+0x150/0x150
>      ? proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x46/0x60
>      ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0x1c7/0x200
>      ? nr_hugepages_store+0x20/0x20
>      ? copy_fd_bitmaps+0x170/0x170
>      ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x1e/0x20
>      ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x2f1/0x300
>      ? unregister_sysctl_table+0xb0/0xb0
>      ? __fd_install+0x78/0x100
>      ? proc_sys_write+0x14/0x20
>      ? __vfs_write+0x4d/0x90
>      ? vfs_write+0xef/0x240
>      ? ksys_write+0xc0/0x160
>      ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50
>      ? __close_fd+0x129/0x150
>      ? __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50
>      ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x200
>      ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> Fixes: e5ff215941d5 ("hugetlb: multiple hstates for multiple page sizes")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thank you!

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>

-- 
Mike Kravetz