linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 24/27] gpio: Add devm_fwnode_gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 17:56:43 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
        Sangwon Jee <jeesw@...fas.com>,
        Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/27] gpio: Add devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_optional() helpers

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 5:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 16:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:00 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Add devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_optional() and
> > > devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index_optional() helpers, similar to regular
> > > devm_gpiod optional versions.  Drivers getting GPIOs from a firmware
> > > node might use it to remove some boilerplate code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> >
> > OK then, I suppose this gets merged with the rest?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> That's the easiest unless you expect some conflicts. Only one next
> patch depends on this so worst case it could wait one cycle.

I believe Dmitry and Linus are familiar with the concept of immutable
branches, so it won't be a problem to create one and share.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko