linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] netfilter: nat: add a range check for l3/l4 protonum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200828164234.GA30990@salvia>
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:42:34 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] netfilter: nat: add a range check for l3/l4
 protonum

Hi Will,

Given this is for -stable maintainers only, I'd suggest:

1) Specify what -stable kernel versions this patch applies to.
   Explain that this problem is gone since what kernel version.

2) Maybe clarify that this is only for stable in the patch subject,
   e.g. [PATCH -stable v3] netfilter: nat: add a range check for l3/l4

Otherwise, this -stable maintainers might not identify this patch as
something that is targetted to them.

Thanks.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:38:32PM +0000, Will McVicker wrote:
> The indexes to the nf_nat_l[34]protos arrays come from userspace. So
> check the tuple's family, e.g. l3num, when creating the conntrack in
> order to prevent an OOB memory access during setup.  Here is an example
> kernel panic on 4.14.180 when userspace passes in an index greater than
> NFPROTO_NUMPROTO.
> 
> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in:...
> Process poc (pid: 5614, stack limit = 0x00000000a3933121)
> CPU: 4 PID: 5614 Comm: poc Tainted: G S      W  O    4.14.180-g051355490483
> Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8150 V2 PM8150 Google Inc. MSM
> task: 000000002a3dfffe task.stack: 00000000a3933121
> pc : __cfi_check_fail+0x1c/0x24
> lr : __cfi_check_fail+0x1c/0x24
> ...
> Call trace:
> __cfi_check_fail+0x1c/0x24
> name_to_dev_t+0x0/0x468
> nfnetlink_parse_nat_setup+0x234/0x258
> ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup+0x4c/0x228
> ctnetlink_new_conntrack+0x590/0xc40
> nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x31c/0x4d4
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x100/0x184
> nfnetlink_rcv+0xf4/0x180
> netlink_unicast+0x360/0x770
> netlink_sendmsg+0x5a0/0x6a4
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x314/0x46c
> SyS_sendmsg+0xb4/0x108
> el0_svc_naked+0x34/0x38
> 
> Fixes: c1d10adb4a521 ("[NETFILTER]: Add ctnetlink port for nf_conntrack")
> Signed-off-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> index 31fa94064a62..0b89609a6e9d 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,8 @@ ctnetlink_parse_tuple(const struct nlattr * const cda[],
>  	if (!tb[CTA_TUPLE_IP])
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (l3num != NFPROTO_IPV4 && l3num != NFPROTO_IPV6)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	tuple->src.l3num = l3num;
>  
>  	err = ctnetlink_parse_tuple_ip(tb[CTA_TUPLE_IP], tuple);
> -- 
> 2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d-goog
>