[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873646lj2y.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 20:29:57 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 34/46] PCI/MSI: Make arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks selectable
On Thu, Aug 27 2020 at 13:20, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Make the architectures and drivers which rely on them select them in Kconfig
>> and if not selected replace them by stub functions which emit a warning and
>> fail the PCI/MSI interrupt allocation.
>
> Sorry, I really don't understand this, so these are probably stupid
> questions.
>
> If CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS is defined, we will supply
> implementations of:
>
> arch_setup_msi_irq
> arch_teardown_msi_irq
> arch_setup_msi_irqs
> arch_teardown_msi_irqs
> default_teardown_msi_irqs # non-weak
>
> You select CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS for ia64, mips, powerpc,
> s390, sparc, and x86. I see that all of those arches implement at
> least one of the functions above. But x86 doesn't and I can't figure
> out why it needs to select CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS.
X86 still has them at that point in the series and the next patch
removes them. I wanted to have the warnings in place before doing so.
> I assume there's a way to convert these arches to hierarchical irq
> domains so they wouldn't need this at all? Is there a sample
> conversion to look at?
For a quick and dirty step it's pretty much the wrapper I used for XEN
and then make sure that the msi_domain pointer is populated is
pci_device::device.
> And I can't figure out what's special about tegra, rcar, and xilinx
> that makes them need it as well.
Those are old drivers from the time where ARM did not use hierarchical
irq domains and nobody cared to fix them up.
> Is there something I could grep for
> to identify them?
git grep arch_setup_msi_irq
git grep arch_teardown_msi_irq
> Is there a way to convert them so they don't need it?
Sure, it just needs some work and probably hardware to test.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists