[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200829083121.GA7851@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:31:21 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] sh: don't allow non-coherent DMA for NOMMU
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:09:43AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > However, by looking at the code, one get the feeling that the DMA
> > support is somewhat prepared to be made optional. I guess it has never
> > been really tested, as the Kconfig option has "depends on HAS_DMA" -
> > and it's been like that as long as I can remember.
>
> It always worked on our "byte-banged" SPI controller, with no DMA
> controller present, before Christoph's changes in this patch series,
Before that nommu sh builds provided a DMA mapping implementation
that even worked for the streaming side (dma_map_*), but would corrupt
data if you used dma_alloc_coherent memory to communicate with the
device.
> and seems to be working now (although I have some other, hopefully
> unrelated regressions to debug) with #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA around the
> if (spi->master->dev.parent->dma_mask) block in mmc_spi_probe. That's
> probably not the right fix though -- why isn't it checking
> host->dma_dev instead and only attempting DMA setup if dma_dev is
> non-null?
I don't think dma_dev can be NULL right now. dma_dev is assigned here:
if (spi->master->dev.parent->dma_mask) {
struct device *dev = spi->master->dev.parent;
host->dma_dev = dev;
but for any OF or real bus device dma_mask never is zero (it actually is
a pointer), and the value of it also is initialized to 32-bit by default,
making this effectively an "if (1) {". The driver needs some way to
communicate if a given device actually is DMA capable or not. Or is that
purely a factor of the platform which would be a little strange.
In which case we should do something like:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
index 39bb1e30c2d722..3b0cc9a70e6432 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (!host->data)
goto fail_nobuf1;
- if (spi->master->dev.parent->dma_mask) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_DMA)) {
struct device *dev = spi->master->dev.parent;
host->dma_dev = dev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists