[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200829102324.fcbddbca8a122814d0508abe@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:23:24 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/23] kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:29:12 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 07:32:11PM +0000, Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > @@ -1311,24 +1257,23 @@ void kprobe_busy_end(void)
> > > void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
> > > {
> > > struct kretprobe_instance *ri;
> > > + struct llist_node *node;
> > >
> > > + /* Early boot, not yet initialized. */
> > > if (unlikely(!kprobes_initialized))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > kprobe_busy_begin();
> > >
> > > + node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
> > > + current->kretprobe_instances.first = NULL;
> >
> > I think we are flushing tk instead of current here.
> > After fixing this to tk, the NULL pointer deference is gone!
>
Cool!!
> Ah, very good! I can indeed confirm that that cures things.
OK, I'll merge this too.
Thank you,
>
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1275,9 +1275,7 @@ void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struc
>
> kprobe_busy_begin();
>
> - node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
> - current->kretprobe_instances.first = NULL;
> -
> + node == __llist_del_all(&tk->kretprobe_instances);
> while (node) {
> ri = container_of(node, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
> node = node->next;
> @@ -1871,6 +1869,7 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
> struct llist_node *first, *node;
> struct kretprobe *rp;
>
> + /* Find all nodes for this frame. */
> first = node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
> while (node) {
> ri = container_of(node, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
> @@ -1900,7 +1899,7 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
> while (first) {
> ri = container_of(first, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
> rp = get_kretprobe(ri);
> - node = first->next;
> + first = first->next;
>
> if (rp && rp->handler) {
> __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &rp->kp);
> @@ -1910,8 +1909,6 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
> }
>
> recycle_rp_inst(ri);
> -
> - first = node;
> }
>
> return (unsigned long)correct_ret_addr;
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/llist.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/llist.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/llist.h
> @@ -237,6 +237,14 @@ static inline struct llist_node *llist_d
> return xchg(&head->first, NULL);
> }
>
> +static inline struct llist_node *__llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
> +{
> + struct llist_node *first = head->first;
> +
> + head->first = NULL;
> + return first;
> +}
> +
> extern struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head);
>
> struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head);
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists