[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGTfZH0xP_q6sMYQ4Q8EeLeDjcQX_ZQotHXxE82wVdBP8-aKhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:46:45 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: samsung: exynos5420/5250: Add IDs to the CPU
parent clk definitions
Hi Sylwester,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:17 AM Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Use non-zero clock IDs in definitions of the CPU parent clocks
> for exynos5420, exynos5250 SoCs. This will allow us to reference
> the parent clocks directly in the driver by cached struct clk_hw
> pointers, rather than doing clk lookup by name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> index 931c70a..7bcff76 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> @@ -253,14 +253,14 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
> /*
> * CMU_CPU
> */
> - MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> + MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_APLL, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
>
> /*
> * CMU_CORE
> */
> - MUX(0, "mout_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
> + MUX(CLK_MOUT_MPLL, "mout_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
>
> /*
> * CMU_TOP
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> index f76ebd6..d07cee2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> @@ -596,13 +596,14 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5420_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
> static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
> MUX(0, "mout_user_pclk66_gpio", mout_user_pclk66_gpio_p,
> SRC_TOP7, 4, 1),
> - MUX(0, "mout_mspll_kfc", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 8, 2),
> - MUX(0, "mout_mspll_cpu", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 12, 2),
> -
> - MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> + MUX(CLK_MOUT_MSPLL_KFC, "mout_mspll_kfc", mout_mspll_cpu_p,
> + SRC_TOP7, 8, 2),
> + MUX(CLK_MOUT_MSPLL_CPU, "mout_mspll_cpu", mout_mspll_cpu_p,
> + SRC_TOP7, 12, 2),
> + MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_APLL, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> - MUX_F(0, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1,
> + MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_KPLL, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1,
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists