[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc7e5dde-9dc0-7d56-48de-777a2e50bca5@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:58:45 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iov_iter: introduce iov_iter_pin_user_pages*()
routines
On 8/29/20 7:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 01:08:52AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
...
>> @@ -1280,7 +1281,11 @@ static inline ssize_t __pipe_get_pages(struct iov_iter *i,
>> maxsize = n;
>> n += *start;
>> while (n > 0) {
>> - get_page(*pages++ = pipe->bufs[iter_head & p_mask].page);
>> + if (use_pup)
>> + pin_user_page(*pages++ = pipe->bufs[iter_head & p_mask].page);
>> + else
>> + get_page(*pages++ = pipe->bufs[iter_head & p_mask].page);
>
> Maybe this would become a little more readable with a local variable
> and a little more verbosity:
>
> struct page *page = pipe->bufs[iter_head & p_mask].page;
>
> if (use_pup)
> pin_user_page(page);
> else
> get_page(page);
>
> *pages++ = page;
>
Yes, that is cleaner, I'll change to that, thanks.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists