[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200830012151.GW14765@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 02:21:51 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Avoid oops when bdi->io_pages==0
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 09:59:41AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> On one system, there was bdi->io_pages==0. This seems to be the bug of
> a driver somewhere, and should fix it though. Anyway, it is better to
> avoid the divide-by-zero Oops.
>
> So this check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/fat/fatent.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c
> index f7e3304..98a1c4f 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c 2020-08-30 06:52:47.251564566 +0900
> +++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c 2020-08-30 06:54:05.838319213 +0900
> @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static void fat_ra_init(struct super_blo
> if (fatent->entry >= ent_limit)
> return;
>
> - if (ra_pages > sb->s_bdi->io_pages)
> + if (sb->s_bdi->io_pages && ra_pages > sb->s_bdi->io_pages)
> ra_pages = rounddown(ra_pages, sb->s_bdi->io_pages);
Wait, rounddown? ->io_pages is supposed to be the maximum number of
pages to readahead. Shouldn't this be max() instead of rounddown()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists